R (on the application of Alexander Thomas Condliff) v North Staffordshire PCT - July 2011

Published on 27 July 2011

1 min read

North Staffordshire PCT, represented by Mills & Reeve and counsel, David Lock QC, has successfully resisted an appeal against the High Court decision of His Honour Judge Waksman QC.

The Court of Appeal upheld the lawfulness of the PCT’s IFR policy, which excludes non-clinical factors from the evaluation of exceptionality. Judgment was handed down on 27 July 2011.

Contact

Jane Williams

Senior Associate
Jane Williams

Senior Associate
- +(44)(0)121 456 8421
- Contact Jane
  
  Contact Jane Williams
  
  * = required
  
  First name *
  
  Last name *
  
  Organisation
  
  Email address *
  
  Phone number
  
  Your message *
  
  Send enquiry
  
  Mills & Reeve will use the information you provide in this form in accordance with our privacy policy. We may from time to time send you general updates by email or post that we think you will find of interest. This includes notification of upcoming event and updates or alerts containing relevant legal news. You can update your preferences at any time and will be able to easily unsubscribe from anything that you do not wish to receive.
  
  check
  
  Thank you
  
  Thank you for your enquiry. We will be in touch shortly.
  
  Close
  
  Reset form
  
  Close overlay
- Birmingham

R (on the application of Alexander Thomas Condliff) v North Staffordshire PCT - July 2011

Further reading

Updated operational support guidance on mandatory vaccinations in care homes

The Court of Protection, Jehovah’s Witnesses and advance decisions

Jane Williams

Contact Jane Williams

Visitors

Existing clients

Staff