The procedure involves two hearings, the first to summon the meetings needed and the second, if appropriate, to sanction the scheme.
At the first hearing, the Court does not consider the merits of the plan, but issues such as:
- The number of meetings required and their composition.
- Issues which might later lead to a scheme being refused.
Two particular points for consideration were whether 168 trade creditors owed a combination of £54,000,000 under different arrangements were given adequate notice of the plan and if they should be placed in the same class. Unlike other creditor classes, they had not been consulted directly, but had been notified of the plan by letter and a webinar, the recording of which remained available. This was sufficient.
The Court also confirmed it would take the same approach it already does with a Scheme of Arrangement. The long established principle is that a class should be confined to persons whose rights are not so dissimilar to make it impossible for them to consult with each other. It was appropriate to place them all in the same class given they would all be unsecured in a subsequent insolvency process and there was evidence all of them would in fact be better off than they would be in an administration, the most likely alternative.
The meetings were ordered to be convened and subsequently each creditor class did then vote overwhelmingly in favour. At a second hearing on 2 September 2020, the plan was subsequently sanctioned by the Court.
In the Matter of Virgin Atlantic Airlines Limited  EWHC 2191 (Ch)
Our content explained
Every piece of content we create is correct on the date it’s published but please don’t rely on it as legal advice. If you’d like to speak to us about your own legal requirements, please contact one of our expert lawyers.