With over 500 lawyers we would expect to be able to provide the specialist skill and experience that you need. Browse our lawyers and teams below.
With nearly 500 lawyers we have the skills and experience you need.
Are you coming to one of our offices and need to know how to find us?
Send us your enquiry and we will get back to you as soon as possible
In a recent Scottish case, the Outer House of the Court of Session held that the employer (SGL Carbon Fibres) bore the burden of proof when seeking to recover alleged overpayments to the contractor (RBG). Although this decision is persuasive only, employers should take note.
The parties were operating under the NEC3 EEC June 2005 (Option C). They departed from the NEC payment mechanism by allowing the employer's quantity surveyor to approve the amount that the contractor intended to claim before he submitted his monthly application for interim payment (under the NEC3, the amount due at each assessment date is to be assessed by the project manager). The court decided that this departure did not negate any obligation on the employer to prove alleged overpayment, just as the contractor holds the burden when seeking payment in addition to the amount that has been certified. Full details of the case can be found in SGL Carbon Fibres Ltd v RBG Ltd  ScotCS CSOH 19.
Ron Plascow, Stuart Thompson and Katherine Souter are giving a seminar entitled "NEC Z clauses: are they necessary?" at the Mills & Reeve London office on 9 February (4-6pm) and at the Mills & Reeve Norwich office on 23 February (8-10am).
Register for My M&R to stay up-to-date with legal news and events, create brochures and bookmark pages.
Log in to your client extranet for free matter information, know-how and documents.
Mills & Reeve system for employees.
Added to your bookmarks
This will be stored in your bookmarks list for 90 days or until you remove it.
This page has been added to your brochure. To manage your brochure click on the button below.
Or click on
at the top of every page.