A disappointed bidder for an asset in a liquidation will only have standing to complain in the insolvency if they are a creditor or contributory

In Re Stay In Style, the trustees of a family trust sought to set aside a sale of a cottage by the liquidator of the partnership. He had sold the cottage to the trustee in bankruptcy of the partners who had then sold it on to an unconnected party. The cottage was lived in by the trustees’ son and it was occasionally used as an overflow home.

Although complaints were raised about the handling of the bidding process, the very fact that something may have gone wrong, or that the challengers were disappointed with its outcome did not entitle them to challenge the liquidator – the Court of Appeal had already established that a challenge to a liquidator’s decision under Section 168 Insolvency Act 1986 was only available to a creditor or a contributory and the trustees were neither.

This is a useful reminder of who can challenge decisions made by liquidators – although the fact that a claim was not available through this route would not necessary prevent some other common law claim, such as breach of some express or implied contract which may have arisen through any bidding process.    

In The Matter of Stay in Style (In Liquidation) [2020] EWHC 538

Our content explained

Every piece of content we create is correct on the date it’s published but please don’t rely on it as legal advice. If you’d like to speak to us about your own legal requirements, please contact one of our expert lawyers.

Mills & Reeve Sites navigation
A tabbed collection of Mills & Reeve sites.
My Mills & Reeve navigation
Subscribe to, or manage your My Mills & Reeve account.
My M&R


Register for My M&R to stay up-to-date with legal news and events, create brochures and bookmark pages.

Existing clients

Log in to your client extranet for free matter information, know-how and documents.


Mills & Reeve system for employees.