With over 500 lawyers we would expect to be able to provide the specialist skill and experience that you need. Browse our lawyers and teams below.
With nearly 500 lawyers we have the skills and experience you need.
Are you coming to one of our offices and need to know how to find us?
Send us your enquiry and we will get back to you as soon as possible
Recent ECHR rulings highlight the very fact sensitive nature of decisions about whether human rights have been infringed.
On 10 April the ECHR ruled that British national Abu Hamza and 4 other suspected terrorists could be extradited to the USA. The court ruled that there would be no infringement of the suspects’ rights not to suffer inhuman or degrading treatment, either by conditions at a US “Super Max” prison, or the potential length of sentences if convicted in the US. The decision in relation to a sixth suspect was adjourned to enable further evidence to be obtained from the USA.
The outcome differed in the Abu Qatada case, where the court held that a Jordanian suspect would be denied a fair trial if extradited from the UK to Jordan. The ECHR was concerned at the lack of assurances from the Jordanian authorities that evidence obtained through torture would not be deployed.
Other high profile extradition cases include those of alleged computer hacker Gary McKinnon and student Richard O’Dwyer, accused of copyright infringement. There is increasing pressure on the UK government to review the US extradition treaty.
Professional Support Lawyer
Register for My M&R to stay up-to-date with legal news and events, create brochures and bookmark pages.
Log in to your client extranet for free matter information, know-how and documents.
Mills & Reeve system for employees.
Added to your bookmarks
This will be stored in your bookmarks list for 90 days or until you remove it.
This page has been added to your brochure. To manage your brochure click on the button below.
Or click on
at the top of every page.