Log in to your client extranet for free matter information, know-how and documents.
Mills & Reeve system for employees.
In Information Commissioner and Health and Safety Executive v O'Hanlon, a case arising under the EIR, the Court considered whether information obtained by a public authority after receiving a request should be treated as falling within the scope of that request if it is held by the time an internal review is conducted.
Last month the Information Commissioner’s Office published “Edtech examined”, a report outlining a range of data protection compliance findings concerning suppliers of edtech systems to primary and secondary schools. The report also has some potential for read across to HE and FE.
The ASA has recently issued new guidance aimed at businesses and organisations that advertise or otherwise market to students. It includes reminders of a range of issues and activities covered under the CAP (non-broadcast) and BCAP (broadcast) codes of advertising practice.
The Office for Students has recently published its Prevent monitoring data for 2024/2025. We take a look at the broad themes covered.
We review the Office for Students’ consultation on Condition C6- treating students fairly.
We look at the changes to UKVI student sponsorship requirements.
We consider the new requirement for in-scope franchised higher education providers to register with the Office for Students.
Martyn’s Law introduces new duties for universities and colleges. Explore key requirements, tiered obligations, and practical steps higher education providers should take now.
Understand “relevant subcontractual arrangements” under OfS Condition E10, including key definitions, exemptions, and how the rules apply to higher education providers.
An overview of OfS Condition E10, including thresholds, subcontracting requirements, and key compliance steps for higher education lead providers.
We’ve been advising higher education providers on franchising and subcontracting, as regulatory focus in this area ramps up.
The Upper Tribunal’s recent decision in Farfan v Information Commissioner and the University of Central Lancashire provides important clarification for universities and other public authorities on when information is considered “held” for the purposes of the FOIA.