The High Court dismissed an appeal against a winding-up order, finding that the alleged debt of US$12 million was not genuinely disputed on substantial grounds. The decision reinforces the strictly limited scope for resisting petitions on construction arguments.
The petition debt arose under a share transfer agreement between the appellant, San Leon ELI Ltd (the Company), and the petitioning creditor, Ocean Pearl Maritime SA (Ocean Pearl).
The agreement formed part of a wider transaction pursuant to which the Company agreed to acquire a minority shareholding in an energy infrastructure vehicle. The petition debt of US$12 million represented the agreed consideration for that transfer and was said by Ocean Pearl to have fallen due and remained unpaid.
The Company resisted the petition on the basis that the debt was genuinely disputed. Its case, both at first instance and on appeal, focused on issues of contractual construction. It was argued that the obligation to pay was contingent upon matters which had not occurred. Those matters were said to include elements of the wider transaction structure, aspects of completion mechanics, and the involvement or consent of third parties. On that footing, the Company contended that the payment obligation had either not crystallised or had been displaced altogether.
Those arguments were rejected. The court held that the Company had failed to demonstrate a bona fide dispute on substantial grounds. Properly construed, the agreement gave rise to an enforceable obligation to pay the US$12 million.
The appeal was dismissed and the winding up order was allowed to stand.
The decision reinforces the established but important point that disputes based on contractual interpretation will be closely scrutinised in the insolvency context. Absent a clearly sustainable construction, based on the language of the agreement and supported by the factual matrix, such arguments will be insufficient to stop a creditor from successfully invoking the winding-up jurisdiction.
San Leon ELI Ltd v Ocean Pearl Maritime SA [2026] 5 WLUK 55
Our content explained
Every piece of content we create is correct on the date it’s published but please don’t rely on it as legal advice. If you’d like to speak to us about your own legal requirements, please contact one of our expert lawyers.