Existing clients

Log in to your client extranet for free matter information, know-how and documents.

Client login

Staff

Mills & Reeve system for employees.

Staff Login
22 Oct 2026
4 minutes read

Trusts and divorce: Common misunderstandings

Trusts are often assumed to place assets safely beyond reach on divorce. In practice, the position is more nuanced. Misunderstandings about how trusts are treated can lead to unrealistic expectations, complicate negotiations and, in some cases, delay resolution. Understanding how and why trusts may be relevant is an important part of navigating financial discussions on separation.

What is a trust?

A trust is a legal structure in which assets are held by trustees for the benefit of one or more beneficiaries. The trustees control and manage the trust property in accordance with the trust deed. Trusts are commonly used for succession planning, asset protection and tax planning, and can take many different forms depending on their purpose.

How trusts can be relevant on divorce

Although trust assets do not belong to a spouse in the same way as personal property, they can still be relevant on divorce depending on the circumstances. Courts look beyond labels and consider the reality of how a trust operates and how it fits into the family’s financial position.

Beneficial interests

If a spouse is a beneficiary of a trust, that interest may be taken into account, even if the trust is discretionary. The court will consider the likelihood of benefit, past patterns of distributions and whether the trust has been used to support the family during the marriage.

Control and access

Control matters. A spouse who benefits under the trust but has substantial power, including the power to appoint or remove trustees, or otherwise exercises influence over trust decisions, may be treated differently from a beneficiary with no real say. The greater the control, the more likely the trust will be viewed as a financial resource available to that spouse.

Why context matters

There is no single rule for how trusts are treated. Courts look carefully at the wider factual context, including when the trust was created, why it was established, how it has operated in practice, and the extent to which it has been relied upon during the marriage. This fact‑specific approach makes outcomes difficult to predict and reinforces the importance of early analysis.

Common misunderstandings about trusts

“Trust assets are always excluded”

This is not correct. While courts cannot directly distribute trust property if it does not belong to either spouse, they can take the existence of a trust into account when assessing the overall financial landscape. Trust wealth may influence how needs are met or how other assets are offset and divided.

“It’s not relevant as the trustees have all the discretion”

A discretionary trust is not automatically ignored. Even where a beneficiary has no fixed entitlement, the court may still consider whether the trust represents a practical resource, particularly if it has historically been used to fund lifestyle or provide financial support.

Why disclosure is important

As with all financial assets, transparency is central to achieving fair financial outcomes. Where a spouse has an interest in, or connection to, a trust, appropriate disclosure of trust documents and financial information is usually required. This allows both parties, and the court, if necessary, to understand the nature of the trust and how it functions in reality. Inadequate or selective disclosure can undermine negotiations and lead to increased costs and delays.

How trusts fit into wider financial discussions

Trusts rarely sit in isolation. They are assessed alongside other assets, income sources and future earning capacity as part of a holistic review of the family’s circumstances. Rather than focusing solely on whether trust assets can be divided, discussions often centre on how the trust affects fairness, affordability and long‑term financial security for both parties.

Closing thoughts

Trusts are not automatically decisive on divorce, but nor are they automatically irrelevant. Much depends on how the trust was set up, how it operates and how it has been used in practice. A clear understanding of these realities can help manage expectations and support more constructive financial discussions, particularly in cases involving family wealth and long‑term planning.

If you are concerned about how a trust may be viewed on divorce, early specialist advice can help clarify your position and manage expectations. Our family law team has extensive experience advising on complex financial arrangements, including trusts and family wealth structures. Get in touch with a member of the team to discuss your circumstances.

Our content explained

Every piece of content we create is correct on the date it’s published but please don’t rely on it as legal advice. If you’d like to speak to us about your own legal requirements, please contact one of our expert lawyers.