Existing clients

Log in to your client extranet for free matter information, know-how and documents.

Client extranet portal

Staff

Mills & Reeve system for employees.

Staff Login
01 Jul 2026
10 minutes read

Gifting your home to children: Smart planning or hidden tax problems?

As part of their estate planning, many clients ask, “can I gift my house to my children?”

This question arises for a variety of reasons. Some clients wish to support their children in becoming homeowners, while others are driven by tax or financial considerations, such as reducing the value of their estate for inheritance tax purposes or removing assets from potential assessment by the local authority should they require care in the future.

If you’re exploring this option as part of your estate planning, this article outlines the key tax and practical implications to be aware of.

Before proceeding with any gifting, it’s essential to seek independent financial, tax, and legal advice.

Given our experience in understanding clients’ motivations and objectives, we can consider these in turn. For the purpose of this blog, we’re focusing on gifts made during a person’s lifetime rather than gifts made under the terms of a will.

Helping children onto the property ladder 

Some clients wish to help their children become homeowners, either by gifting them an interest in an existing home or by purchasing a house with the intention of gifting it.

This can be done through an outright gift or, if parents wish to retain an element of control due to their children’s age, financial situation or personal circumstances, by using a trust structure.

Outright gifting

Tax implications of outright gifting

Gifting houses to children may trigger Capital Gains Tax (CGT) as the transfer is treated as a disposal at market value for CGT purposes, even if no money changes hands. 

Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT) may also apply, depending on the circumstances, so specialist property tax advice is recommended.

For Inheritance Tax (IHT), the gift will be considered a Potentially Exempt Transfer (PET). No IHT is due at the time of the gift. If the parent(s) survive for seven years after making the gift, it becomes fully exempt from IHT and falls outside their estate. If the parent(s) die within seven years, the value of the gift at the time it was made is brought back into their estate and set against the nil rate band (currently £325,000).  

Any IHT due on a failed PET is usually payable by the recipient of the gift (in this case the child/children) unless the will states otherwise. Taper relief may reduce the tax if death occurs more than three years after the gift. Importantly, if the parent(s) continue to benefit from the house (eg living there rent-free), the gift may be treated as a ‘gift with reservation of benefit’ and remain in the parent(s)' estate (and be subject to IHT) regardless of the seven-year period. 

Practical implications of outright gifting

Once the gift is made, the house belongs to the children outright. This means it isn’t protected from risks such as divorce, bankruptcy, or other personal challenges the children may face in the future.

When transferring a home to children, a formal transfer of legal title must be completed to move the property from the parents’ names to the children, or to trustees where a trust structure is used (see section below). A property valuation may also be needed to determine any IHT, CGT or SDLT liability. If the property is subject to a mortgage, lender consent will be required before the transfer can take place. For leasehold homes, additional restrictions in the lease may also limit or govern how and when a transfer or gift can be made. These factors often mean that early advice from a property legal advisor is essential.

Using a trust

Tax implications of using a trust

Gifting homes into a trust may also give rise to CGT and SDLT in the same way as an outright gift. However, the IHT treatment differs. Transfers into most trusts are treated as Chargeable Lifetime Transfers (CLTs). If the value of the house is below the parent(s)' available nil rate band (£325,000), it can be placed into the trust without an immediate IHT charge. If the value exceeds this, a 20% lifetime tax charge will apply on the excess.

The transfer will use up some or all of the parent(s)' nil rate band. After seven years, the nil rate band is refreshed for future planning. Although the asset falls outside the parent(s) estate once in trust, trust property is subject to its own tax regime, including ten-year anniversary charges, exit charges, and ongoing income tax and CGT obligations.

Practical implications of using a trust

Assets held in trust are managed by trustees, providing greater protection than an outright gift. This can shield the home from issues affecting the beneficiaries, such as divorce or insolvency. There is, however, greater administrative responsibility, including ongoing reporting and compliance requirements. The same practical steps highlighted above regarding transfer of title, valuations, and property advice apply to both outright gifting and gifting into trust.

Gifting part of the family home

Because the family home often represents the largest part of an individual’s estate, some clients consider gifting a share of their main residence to reduce the value of their estate for IHT purposes. This requires caution.

Tax implications of gifting part of the family home

Provided the home is the only or main residence, any gain arising on the gift may be covered by Principal Private Residence Relief for CGT purposes.

Although such a gift is treated as a PET for IHT purposes, if the parent(s) continue to live in the property, HMRC will generally regard this as a ‘gift with reservation of benefit’. In essence, the parent(s) are considered not to have fully given up the asset, meaning it remains within their estate for IHT.

To avoid this, the parent(s) would need to pay full market rent to their children for the portion of the property gifted and must ensure all running costs are paid appropriately. Failure to do so will mean the gift is ineffective for IHT purposes.

Practical implications of gifting part of the family home

Gifting part of the main residence exposes the house to the personal circumstances of the children, including divorce or bankruptcy. Additionally, if the donor wishes to move or downsize in future, the child will need to agree to and be involved in any sale or conveyancing process. The practical considerations for the transfer of title, valuations, relevant consents, and property advice will again need to be considered.

Gifting part of the family home into a trust for protection against care home fees (asset protection trusts)

In recent months, there’s been considerable discussion about the use, and frequent mis-selling, of trusts that claim to safeguard the main residence from care home fee assessments. These structures are often promoted on the basis that, once a house is placed into trust, it’s no longer treated as the individual’s asset and therefore can’t be taken into account by the local authority when assessing care funding. This type of planning tends to appeal to families whose wealth primarily consists of their home rather than significant liquid assets.

Practical implications of asset protection trusts

What is sometimes overlooked is that placing a house into such a trust requires the legal title to be transferred into the names of the trustees. While the original owners may act as trustees themselves, additional trustees are usually appointed, and any future decision to sell or deal with the home must be made by all trustees collectively. This inevitably results in a loss of control. If trustees disagree, disputes can arise, potentially requiring court intervention to resolve the matter.

Effectiveness of asset protection trusts

Importantly, when an individual later requires care, the council will examine the reasons the trust was created. If the dominant purpose was to avoid paying care home fees, the arrangement is likely to be treated as a deliberate deprivation of assets. In such cases, the council will disregard the trust entirely and include the house within the financial assessment, leaving the planning ineffective and the costs incurred in establishing the trust effectively wasted.

Even where the council accepts that the trust was not created to avoid care fees, individuals must still consider the practical outcome: if they have limited other income or assets, the trust may reduce their ability to contribute toward or select the standard of care they prefer.

Tax implications of asset protection trusts

The tax consequences of transferring a home into an “asset protection trust” mirror those associated with usual trust arrangements. CGT and SDLT may arise on the transfer, and for IHT purposes the gift will generally be treated as a Chargeable Lifetime Transfer. If the parent(s) continues to live in the house without paying full market rent, this may also constitute a gift with reservation of benefit, meaning the house remains within their estate for IHT.

Ongoing compliance requirements under the relevant property trust regime, such as ten-year anniversary and exit charges, must also be factored in.

Summary

It’s crucial to approach any decision to gifting homes, whether outright or into trust, holistically, taking into account the relevant legal, tax and practical considerations. The most appropriate option will depend on personal circumstances and should be determined only after coordinated legal, tax and financial advice.

As part of this process, the parent(s)' intentions should be clearly documented to reduce the risk of future disputes and to create an accurate record of the purpose and terms of the gift.

It’s also important to review existing wills and broader estate plans to ensure the proposed gift aligns with the overall strategy and doesn’t unintentionally create imbalance or conflict.

Taking a coordinated, well informed approach helps ensure that all implications are fully understood and that the chosen course — whether making an outright gift, creating a trust, or deciding not to gift, supports the parent(s)' objectives and provides appropriate protection for them and their family.

Comparison of gifting approaches:

Type of gift

Tax implications

Practical implications

Outright gifting of a home (including main residence) to children

  • CGT may arise as the transfer is treated as a disposal at market value
  • If gifting your main residence CGT Principal Private Residence Relief may apply
    — SDLT may apply depending on circumstances
  • Treated as a PET for IHT — no IHT at the time of gifting, becomes fully exempt if the donor survives seven years
  • Failed PETs may attract IHT and taper relief may apply
  • Risk of ‘gift with reservation’ if the parent continues to benefit, meaning the asset stays in their estate
  • To avoid gift with reservation of benefit rules, full market rent must be paid and running costs properly shared
  • Children own the home outright, leaving it exposed to risks such as divorce or bankruptcy
  • Formal transfer of legal title and valuation required
  • Any future move or sale requires the child’s agreement
  • Mortgage lender consent may be needed; leasehold restrictions may apply
  • Early specialist property advice is often essential
  • If paying market rent, this creates an income tax consequence for the children (they will pay income tax on the rental income)

Gifting a home (including main residence) into a trust

  • CGT and SDLT may arise as with outright gifts
  • Treated as a CLT for IHT — if within the £325,000 nil rate band, no immediate tax; above this, a 20% lifetime charge applies
  • Uses some/all of the donor’s nil rate band; refreshed after seven years
  • Trust assets subject to ten-year IHT charges, exit charges and ongoing tax and administration compliance
  • Trustees manage the asset, offering greater protection than outright gifts
  • Provides shielding from beneficiaries’ financial or personal issues
  • Increased administrative obligations and reporting requirements
  • Same title transfer and valuation considerations as above
  • If gifted for the purpose of protecting home from care fees, councils may treat the arrangement as a ‘deliberate deprivation of assets’, making it ineffective for care fee assessment
  • Even if accepted for care home fee planning, the trust may reduce the individual’s ability to choose their preferred care
  • Banks may be reluctant to lend against trust-owned property

Our content explained

Every piece of content we create is correct on the date it’s published but please don’t rely on it as legal advice. If you’d like to speak to us about your own legal requirements, please contact one of our expert lawyers.