Log in to your client extranet for free matter information, know-how and documents.
Mills & Reeve system for employees.
When it comes to disputes over estates, emotions can run high and things can quickly escalate. If you or your family are struggling, we can help.
We know how difficult disagreements like this can be. We’ll be sympathetic and sensitive, while still focused on getting the best result for you.
We act for all sorts of clients in this area, either as claimant or defendant. That includes individual beneficiaries, trustees, executors, administrators and charities.
Some of the services we offer include:
In these types of disputes, sometimes it’s impossible to avoid going to court. But we’ll always try to fix things as quickly and cost-effectively as we can.
Here are just some examples of our recent work in this area:
Nearly all of our work is confidential but last year we helped a record number of clients resolve their disputes.
We're growing our team and adding new expertise including an ability to serve LGBT+ communities.
The team is proud to be top rated in the legal directories across large parts of the country.
Our team of legal experts are here to support you.
Contact one of our lawyers today.
Our team are experts in this complicated field. Most are members of the industry’s top professional body too (ACTAPS – the Association of Contentious Trust & Probate Specialists).
The role of a deputy for a person’s property and financial affairs is an important role, and one which means you have the responsibility of making financial decisions on behalf of an incapacitated person. The Office of the Public Guardian – whose role it is to make sure deputi...
This article explores the High Court decision in Maile v Maile, outlining the background of the case, the decision and the key takeaways.
On 23 July 2025, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Stevens (Respondent) v Hotel Portfolio II UK Ltd (In Liquidation) and another (Appellants). The decision provides important clarification on liability for dishonest assistance where there is a breach of fiduciary d...
The Supreme Court handed down its unanimous verdict in the case of Standish v Standish, clarifying the stance taken by the courts when assessing matrimonial assets during divorce proceedings. This impacts how spousal claims under the Inheritance Act 1975 are assessed.
The recent case involving Mr Peace, who ended his life with the assistance of a beneficiary under his will, raises some interesting questions about the Suicide Act 1961, the forfeiture rule, and evolving attitudes toward assisted dying.
When someone writes a will, they typically appoint one or more executors to carry out their final wishes and manage their estate. But what happens if the sole executor – the only person named to handle this responsibility – dies or loses mental capacity?
The Law Commission released their report, “Modernising Wills Law”, which proposes significant reform to the law governing wills in England and Wales. In this article, we explore these proposals mean for private client disputes.
The One Direction singer, Liam Payne, had died without making a Will. This article explores the implications of the situation and discusses why it would have been better for Liam to have made a Will.
Reported cases of controlling or coercive behaviour are on the rise. Private client solicitors who have concerns that their client may be a victim of coercive control have to balance their duty of client confidentiality against the risk that the client might suffer harm if the...
Yes, you can challenge a will. There are several different grounds for challenging a will, depending on the circumstances and the evidence available. These grounds (explained in more detail below) include issues with the execution of the will, lack of mental capacity, lack of knowledge and approval, and undue influence/duress. Sometimes, a will can be challenged by someone who feels they have been unreasonably provided for under the will or who have been excluded altogether.
Some grounds for challenging a will are:
If you want to challenge a will, although there's technically no time limit which applies, you should ideally seek legal advice from a specialist lawyer as soon as possible and preferably well before the estate in question is distributed. Note, however, that there's a short time limit for making a claim under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975, if you have not been reasonably provided for or excluded from a will. The time limit for this type of claim is six months from the date of the Grant of Probate or Letters of Administration. If you're outside this time limit, you should still seek legal advice as in certain cases the court is prepared to allow a claim to be made out of time, but you must act as quickly as possible.
One possible option is to claim under the doctrine of proprietary estoppel, which in certain circumstances allows you to enforce a promise that was made to you by the deceased before their death. Where proprietary estoppel is claimed, you must show that a promise was made to you and that you relied on that promise to your detriment. These claims can be difficult to prove in practice given much of the evidence is usually verbal rather than documented and so you should seek specialist legal advice as soon as possible.
Relevant evidence you might need to assist in proving your case will depend on the sort of challenge you are raising, but can include:
An Inheritance Act claim (sometimes called a 1975 Act claim) is one that can be made by certain relatives/spouses/civil partners/children or people who were being maintained by the deceased immediately before their death where reasonable financial provision has not been made for that person. Such a claim is made under The Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 and requires the court to consider the factors laid down in section of the Act, such as:
Following consideration of the above, and if the application is successful, the Court can make a range of awards, including the transfer of property, lifetime rights to live in a property, a lump sum or periodic payments.
Yes, they can be removed – but only in certain circumstances. There are a number of ways an executor/trustee can be removed. An executor can chose to renounce (stand down) voluntarily before they take any substantive steps to administer an estate. However, once they take any substantive steps in the estate (called intermeddling) or taken out a Grant of Probate they can only be removed via a court order. A court will make such an order removing an executor if there are good reasons to do so – ie the executor has lost capacity, is no longer willing/capable of dealing with the estate or has acted in serious breach of their duties (eg by failing to pay the beneficiaries their entitlement).
A trustee can retire voluntarily provided there are other existing or new trustees who will continue to act. If a trustee has acted in breach of duty, they can be removed by the court following an application from a dissatisfied beneficiary.
Yes, you can. You can raise a challenge if you think the power of attorney document was not executed correctly, there were issues with the donor’s capacity when it was signed or there are suspicions an attorney is not acting in the best interests of the donor and has breached their duties. It's advisable to gather evidence to support any suspicions and seek legal advice as early as possible. Any concerns can initially be raised with the attorney in question. It's also possible to report such suspicions to the Office of the Public Guardian who may investigate further and ultimately involve the Court of Protection if needed to ensure the interests of the donor are looked after.
As a beneficiary, you're entitled to request certain information from the trustees. Ordinarily a beneficiary is entitled to know that they are a beneficiary in the first place and to see the trust document plus annual trust accounts on request. You have no absolute right to see any further documents although the position will vary depending on the complexity and value of the trust, whether there is a dispute and the individual circumstances. Some trustees will make disclosure of documentation to beneficiaries quite readily whereas others will be more resistant. If in doubt what you're entitled to see, seek expert advice.
Will disputes can be lengthy, acrimonious and expensive. The starting position in relation to costs is that the loser pays. This means that the successful party should usually receive some or all of their costs as part of the settlement or court order. These costs can come from the losing party or from the estate depending on the circumstances of the case.
The court has a wide discretion though on what costs order to make and this can depend on the reasonableness of the costs and the conduct of the parties. If you lose a claim, there's a risk you would be ordered to pay the other side’s costs as well having to pay your own. It's worth exploring all available options to assist with the payment of your legal costs, such as funding arrangements (no win, no fee or deferred fee arrangements), legal expenses insurance or after the event insurance.
This will vary depending on the individual circumstances of your case. An executor has a duty to act in the best interests of the beneficiaries and to act in timely manner – and so they should pay your entitlement as soon as reasonably possible. However, this will vary depending on the size, nature (eg there may be property that needs to be sold) and complexity of the estate in question. Before an estate can be administered, a grant of probate or letters of administration needs to be issued – and this can take several months. Following this, steps can then be taken to liquidise the estate assets, pay debts, taxes, and fees before distribution. If the estate is large and taking a long time to administer, it may be possible to seek an interim distribution.
An executor is not bound to make distributions from the estate in the first year after the deceased died, but after that time beneficiaries are entitled to interest on any outstanding legacies.
There is no such thing as a common law spouse, even if a couple have been living together for a long time and/or have children together. Under the intestacy rules (see below), a partner has no automatic right to inherit. However, they may be able to make a claim against their deceased’s partner’s estate under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 or for a beneficial interest in any shared property. As the position can be complicated it's sensible to seek specialist legal advice as soon as possible.
These are the statutory rules that apply to the administration of an estate where the deceased died intestate i.e., without making a will. In such circumstances, their estate will be administered in accordance with the intestacy rules valid at the date of death. The rules specify how the estate should be divided between family members depending on the deceased’s circumstances (e.g., whether they were married, had children etc).
The Mills & Reeve estate, trust and will disputes team provides expert legal services for all types of trust and will disputes. They are specialist lawyers and many of the team are members of the industry’s professional body; ACTAPS (Association of Contentious Trust and Probate Specialists).
Here are just a few of the services the team offers:
